francesco miraglia Tag

  • Sort Blog:
  • All
  • Articoli Recenti
  • Comunicati stampa
  • Evidenza
  • GALLERIA
  • In Evidenza
  • L'inchiesta
  • L'indiscreto
  • La giustizia e la mala giustizia
  • La Vetrina
  • Le vostre storie
  • Minori
  • Primo Piano
  • Principale home
  • Psichiatria
  • Scelta di campo
  • Sentenze
  • Senza categoria

L’Università “Agorà” di Oradea sigla una collaborazione con Francesco Miraglia

L’università Agorà di Oradea e Francesco Miraglia, avvocato del foro di Madrid, hanno recentemente siglato un protocollo di collaborazione, sottolineando l’importanza di questa partnership nel campo del diritto minorile, penale e nella lotta contro la violenza di genere.
Questa collaborazione darà l’opportunità agli studenti dell’Università “Agorà” di partecipare a seminari, corsi e conferenze guidate da Francesco Miraglia, rinomato esperto in diritto minorile e impegnato nella tutela delle vittime di violenza di genere.
La sinergia tra Francesco Miraglia, avvocato del Foro di Madrid e l’Università “Agorà” promette di fornire un importante scambio internazionale di conoscenza e risorse, permettendo agli studenti di accedere a materiale didattico di alta qualità e di apprendere da una delle figure di spicco della giustizia minorile. Questa collaborazione, che durerà 3 anni, non solo migliorerà l’esperienza educativa degli studenti, ma dimostra anche la rilevanza e l’impatto del lavoro e l’impegno di Francesco Miraglia oltre i confini nazionali. Lo stesso Miraglia si è dichiarato soddisfatto ed entusiasta di collaborare con l’Università di Oradea. Questa partnership ci permetterà di offrire agli studenti un’eccellente opportunità di apprendimenti, arricchimento del curriculum con una prospettiva globale e contribuendo alla formazione di futuri professionisti consapevoli e preparati. Lp stesso Miraglia: non posso che essere grato al rettore di Agorà per questa possibilità e non vedo l’ora di avviare questo prezioso scambio di conoscenza.

Considerazioni e riflessioni sull’art. 31 comma 3° del Testo Unico Immigrazioni

In base all’articolo 31 comma 3° del Testo Unico Immigrazione italiano (Decreto
Legislativo del 25 luglio 1998, n. 286) il Tribunale per i minorenni, per gravi motivi connessi
con lo sviluppo psicofisico e tenuto conto dell’età e delle condizioni di salute del minore
straniero che si trova nel territorio italiano, può autorizzare l’ingresso o la permanenza del
familiare del minore che si trovi sul territorio italiano, per un periodo di tempo determinato,
anche in deroga alle altre disposizioni della presente legge. L’autorizzazione è revocata
quando vengono a cessare i gravi motivi che ne giustificavano il rilascio o per attività del
familiare incompatibili con le esigenze del minore o con la permanenza in Italia. I
provvedimenti sono comunicati alla rappresentanza diplomatica o consolare e al questore
per gli adempimenti di rispettiva competenza.
E’ questa una disposizione che nell’ordinamento giuridico italiano trova applicazione in
tutti i casi in cui al genitore del minore straniero, madre o padre, che si trova in Italia viene
revocato il rinnovo o la concessione del permesso di soggiorno per vari motivi e
soprattutto nel caso in cui emergano elementi ostativi al rilascio od al rinnovo di un titolo di
soggiorno: si pensi al genitore che ha subito condanne penali per reati ostativi all’ingresso
o al soggiorno dello straniero in territorio italiano (ess. reati in materia di cessione di
sostanze stupefacenti) o che venga considerato pericoloso per l’ordine pubblico.
In tutti questi casi entrano dunque in conflitto due interessi, entrambi tutelati dalla
Costituzione italiana e cioè da un lato vi è l’interesse alla conservazione dell’ordine
pubblico e della sicurezza dello Stato, dall’altro vi è invece l’interesse alla salvaguardia
dell’unità familiare e del diritto del minore a crescere con i propri genitori naturali,
considerato altresì che il diritto all’unità familiare è regolato e tutelato, nelle sue condizioni
di attuazione, anche dagli artt. 29 e 30 del Decreto Legislativo n° 286/98 e cioè dallo
stesso Testo Unico Immigrazione.
L’art. 31 comma 3° del Testo Unico Immigrazione italiano è dunque una norma che,
fin dalla sua entrata in vigore, si è posta al centro di un vivace e costante dibattito in
dottrina ed anche in giurisprudenza proprio perchè tale norma cerca di contemperare vari
interessi che, come si è detto, sono parimenti garantiti a livello costituzionale.
Il dibattito interpretativo si è acceso soprattutto intorno al concetto di “gravi motivi”
che possono giustificare la permanenza in territorio italiano del genitore del minore
contemplato dal’art. 31 comma 3° del Testo Unico Immigrazione: ed infatti tali “gravi
motivi” sono stati interpretati, alternativamente, come il ricorrere di una situazione di
emergenza, a carattere eccezionale o contingente (non rinvenibile nelle ordinarie
necessità di accompagnarne il processo d’integrazione ed il percorso educativo e presente
in caso di problemi di salute del minore) o come il fatto di trovarsi in presenza di minori di
tenerissima età, tenuto conto della grave compromissione e del sicuro danno all’equilibrio
psico – fisico che determina in tale situazione l’allontanamento o la mancanza di uno dei
genitori. Per questa via anche la giurisprudenza della Suprema Corte di Cassazione aveva
inizialmente adottato un orientamento restrittivo riconoscendo detti gravi motivi soltanto in
casi del tutto eccezionali da valutarsi caso per caso (si pensi al minore con problemi di
salute gravi o al minore con problematiche psichiche…), limitando però tale interpretazione
restrittiva ai soli casi di ingresso in Italia del genitore del minore che non ha i requisiti per
ottenere il rilascio di un titolo di soggiorno (in tal senso si erano espresse le Sezioni Unite
della Corte di Cassazione con la Sentenza n° 22216/2006) ed anche taluni Tribunali per i
Minorenni e Corti d’Appello Italiane avevano accolto tale orientamento restrittivo.
Succesivamente però si è sviluppato un orientamento maggiormente estensivo e
favorevole per il minore straniero che si trovi in Italia a salvaguardia del principio dell’unità
familiare costituzionalmente garantito. Così, infatti, la Corte di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite,
a partire dalla Sentenza n° 21799/2010, ha stabilito che i gravi motivi ricorrono non
necessariamente in casi eccezionali strettamente connessi a problemi di salute del
minore, ma anche laddove siano rinvenibili eventi traumatici che trascendano il normale
disagio dovuto al rimpatrio, considerando sia il potenziale danno attuale che deriverebbe
al minore in seguito all’allontanamento forzato del genitore, sia effettuando una
valutazione prognostica. Tale intrpretazione che potremmo definire “estensiva” del
concetto di gravi motivi, secondo la Corte di Cassazione trova giustificazione nel fatto che
il legislatore, all’atto della formulazione dell’art. 31 comma 3° del Testo Unico
Immigrazione, ha volutamente utilizzato una formula a carattere generale ricomprendente
qualsiasi danno effettivo, concreto, percepibile ed obbiettivamente grave che in
considerazione dell’età o delle condizioni di salute ricollegabili al complessivo equilibrio
psico-fisico deriva, o è altamente probabile, deriverà al minore, dall’allontanamento del
familiare o dal suo definitivo sradicamento dall’ambiente in cui e’ cresciuto (in tal senso vi
è anche la recente pronuncia della Corte di Cassazione Civile Sezioni Unite n.
15750/2019).
Alla luce di quanto ora esposto, risulta evidente che l’art. 31 comma 3 del Testo Unico
Immigrazione è uno strumento che in concreto garantisce il rispetto dell’interesse
superiore del minore e la tutela rafforzata dei suoi diritti fondamentali, sia della personalità,
sia socio-economici, riconosciuti a vari livelli normativi, dalle convenzioni internazionali
(Convenzione ONU sui diritti dell’infanzia e dell’adolescenza del 1989), dal diritto
comunitario (Direttiva 2003/86/CE; Trattato di Lisbona, 2009) ed europeo (CEDU, 1950) e,
come si è detto, dalla Carta Costituzionale italiana (artt. 2, 3, 10, 29, 30, 31, 32).
Prima del rilascio al genitore del permesso di soggiorno per assistenza minore ex art.
31 comma 3 del Testo Unico Immigrazione, il Tribunale per i Minorenni, dopo aver ricevuto
la richiesta di detto titolo di soggiorno da parte di un genitore o di entrambi tramite ricorso,
svolge un’indagine approfondita in merito alla capacità genitoriale ed alle caratteristiche
personali e di reddito del genitore stesso.
Tale attività di indagine viene demandata dal Tribunale dei Minori ai Servizi Sociali del
Comune di residenza della famiglia del minore straniero; i Servizi Sociali provvederanno
all’ascolto dei genitori presenti sul territorio nazionale e dei minori capaci di discernimento
(preadolescenti e adolescenti), nonchè alla verifica in merito all’idoneità alloggiativa dei
genitori ed alla loro capacità economica volta anche al mantenimento del figlio minore.
Il Tribunale dei Minori provvede poi ad acquisire, tramite la Questura, le informazioni
sulla pendenza di denunce a carico dei genitori o di altre informazioni utili. Se necessario il
Tribunale dei Minori acquisisce anche informazioni dalle strutture scolastiche frequentate
dai minori e dai Servizi Sociali, nonchè dalle strutture sanitarie dove si trova
eventualmente in cura il minore.
Al termine di questa fase procedurale, in caso di provvedimento positivo del Trbunale
per i Minorenni, la Questura del luogo di residenza dei genitori, rilascerà il predetto titolo di
soggiorno per assistenza minore.
Tale permesso di soggiorno consente al suo titolare, sia esso genitore o parente più
prossimo del bambino, di svolgere attività lavorativa, tuttavia, essendo a tempo
determinato, in prossimità della sua scadenza richiede di essere rinnovato. Il rinnovo potrà
avvenire previa autorizzazione del competente Tribunale dei Minori, mediante la
presentazione di un nuovo ricorso depositato presso la cancelleria di detto Tribunale.
Il permesso di soggiorno ex art. 31 comma 3 Testo Unico Immigrazione è altresì
convertibile in permesso di soggiorno per motivi di lavoro autonomo o subordinato.

Never ending violence against women cildren

AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, http://univagora.ro/jour/index.php/aijjsISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677Vol. 17, No. 2 (2023), pp. 52-5952NEVER-ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND
CHILDREN
F. MIRAGLIA

Francesco Miraglia National Institute of Family Pedagogy in Rome, Italy & Madrid Forum, SpainE-mail: info@avvocatofrancescomiraglia.itAbstract: This article regards the subject of “secondary victimization”.It regards a judicial term which still appears to be unknown, not only to the public opinionbut also to justice operators; however, it defines a reality of domestic violence andassisted violence which, unfortunately, are still very frequent and dramatically affect thelife of many women and of their children and it consists in blaming the victim of theviolence.Keywords: secondary victimization, victim, violence, phenomenon, cases of minors, foster families, accusation.

INTRODUCTIONSecondary victimization means “victimization which does not happen as a directconsequence of the criminal act, but throughout the response given by institutions andindividuals to the victim” (definition given by the Reccomendation of May 8 of the Council of Europe).The victim becomes a double victim: the first time because of the domestic violence whichshe is subject to, secondarily in a judiciary context since the children are removed fromthe victim who reported the violence in order to safeguard the children involved!This kind of double (or triple?) violence may be taken out through judicial, forensic, andassistential victimization.With a specific regard to the kind of violence that happens in judicial separation, removalof minors, limitation of parental responsibility proceedings, the authorities called torepress violence -probably fail at recognising it or do not give it the due relevance –theyfail to adopt the right measures aimed at safeguarding the victim, and instead underlinethe victim’s responsibility in the violence to which she has been subject to.Underestimating the phenomenon of domestic violence against women has the directeffect of subjecting the victim to secundary victimisation in the context of civil or minorsproceedings. Therefore, acting as a consequence appears necessary, especially in orderto ensure the right to justice and the certainty of the punishment since our legal systemisrequired to prosecute crimes and convict guilty people, not mistake them for thevictims.I am not the only one claiming this, also the Parliamentary Commission of inquiry onfeminicide and on any other form of violence were the main subject of a very importantinquiry regarding secondary victimization on women and on their children, however,barely anyone has ever heard about it(Art. 27, Italian Constituion).So now I’m going to be the one to disclose the Parliamentary Commission Inquiry, alongwith theoutcome of my experience in the field, my thoughts on the subject.Therefore, I hope that with my new book I will be able to contribute, along with doing myjob on a daily basis, in advocating for victims of domestic violence and their children,despiteall of the hurdles that are deliberately imposed to me.

Francesco MIRAGLIA531. The premises of rising violence against women and childrenFor decades I have dealt with cases of minors taken away from their biological mothersvictims of domestic violence, and this happens inthe light of judicial measures thatappear to be questionable, given by reports written by the Social Services and by officialtechnical reports (CTU) which appear to be equally, if not even more questionable(Guidi et al., 2013).The measures have led to the removal of minors not only from the mother and their home,but also from all of their relatives (such as grandparents, aunties and uncles, cousins,older brothers or sisters which appear to be available for their custody) and have led tothe direct consequence of the temporary placement of the minors -which usuallybecomes a permanent placement in special homes or to family units.Sometimes the children are even placed with the father who is accused of violence.. manyof these cases are dramatically known and are still waiting for the final sentence.In the meantime, the unit composed by mother and child, biological or lawful, nowdismembered and dispersed, has been subject to an existential damage which appears tobe irreversible and that can never be compensated on a affective, personal and relationallevel, and last but not least, on an economic level.On this last subject –money, it’s always about money! –foster care outside of thebiological family lead to very high costs and it is public money.It is estimated that a minorplaced in foster care, almost always private ones, costs the Italian State and/or Regionsaround 400 Euros a day, if not even more!(Miraglia, 2023)Foster families are obviously entitled to forms of reimbursement and compensation,holders of a maintenance allowance of more than 6-700 euros per month. Whereas, basedon my experience in the field, I can confidently say that at least 50 or 60% of the removalproceedings have no reason to exist and that minors could indeed, without any kind ofharm, remain placed with their own mother if supported, even economically by the State,Regions, and local authorities. The expenses would surely be lower and the results muchbetter!But why does this happen? One could ask. Why are minors removed from the mother whohas reported a domestic violence, which has often occurred before their own eyes? Itusually happens because women have reported violence episodes taken out by their ex-husband or ex-partner, and for this specific reason are considered as weak andoverprotective of their children, hindering their relationship with the father.An accusation which finds it origin in the fact that the father, even if violent towards themother, has never directly harmed the child and therefore, could be considered a goodfather.Overmore, the mothers are accused of failing in the attempt to protect their children andaccused of not reporting the father of their children before(Miraglia, 2020).Whichever perspective you look at it from, women who are subject to domestic violenceare pointed out and blamed as responsable for the violence and unfit to raise theirchildren, which are taken away without any form of support from the institutions.The consequence is that children, in the name of a right to parenthood, in thethe vast majority of cases only serves to reiterate the ancestral intra-family superiority ofthe male role over the female one (a superiority particularly felt in Italy and which in factrestores the parental power which, even by law, should have been superseded by manyyears), are forced to keep in contact with their violent father, are given shared foster carein their name of double parenthood or, in the majority of cases, taken away from thefather but also removed from the mother because the majority of complaints aboutdomestic violence are not even taken into account.

NEVER ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN54This is confirmed by the judges, magistrates and the Parliamentary Commission Reportinto femicide: 95% of the courts are unable to say in how many cases regardingseparations, divorces, measures regarding children, situations of mistreatment and abuseemerge; and this happens frequently even when the domestic violence is known and verifiedsince almost a third of the cases, the documents regarding the criminal proceedings areacquired by civil proceedings. The complaint filed by the abused mother usually servesto set the perverse mechanism of removal from the family or placement in foster care(Antonocci, 1986).The consequences of secundary victimization affect on the short and long term many ofthe cognitive processes, such as memories, attention span, the ability to elaborateinformations.On a psychological level they can be very severe manifesting in fear if not terror, a senseof helplessness, low self-esteem, depression, anxiety, post traumatic stress disorder,traumatic stress, social isolation, shame, guilt and loss of trust in other, institutions withthe devastating consequences in the relationship between mother and child, not tomention thedirect consequences that children face on a daily basis.There may also be a long lasting impact on pyhisical health, causing sleeping disorders,heart problems, gastrointestinal disorders and other stress related disorders. Victimsmay also experience challenges in interpersonal relationships and in their ability to leada satisfying lifestyle.These kind of disorders, which if not overcome can lead to spirals of violence, perpetuatesa cycle in which the child who once was victim of violence, becomes himself or herself abearer of the same violence.Let us now look more closely at what this violence is, this triple violence -gender, domestic, assisted -which women and their minor children are still unable to escape or oppose, in many cases becoming victims twice over: once of their executioner, a second time of the decisions taken in the name and on behalf of Italian law.Often in everyday reality, in the family environment, it is difficult, if not impossible, to draw a clear line of demarcation between the three types of violence. In any case, as statistics show, the common element is almost always violence against or through women, and it almost always involves a woman mother.1.1. What is violenceFirst of all, it is good to clarify the terminology because only in this way is it possible to outline the problem and, above all, qualify the crime of which one is a victim in order to act in the most appropriate way in order to protect oneself and free oneself from it. Furthermore, these are definitions, especially those of domestic violence and witnessed violence, which are still little known to the great mass of public opinion. It is often combined with the more well-known “stalking” (or persecutory acts) but, as we will see better later, it is not always the same type of violence and crime and, consequently, the protections and sanctions.It is therefore appropriate, first of all, to recall the definition of violence, as given by the World Health Organization (WHO):“Violence is defined as the intentional use of physical force or power, whether threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, resulting in or having a high degree of likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological damage, poor development or deprivation”(based on Francesco Morcavallo’s speech at the “il Caso Bibbiano” conference organized by Renovatio21 in Cavriago on 4 october 2019).
Francesco MIRAGLIA55The numbers are impressive and we will analyze them in detail below. For now, just think that, according to the report that Save the Children (one of the most important international organizations for the protection of children and adolescents) published in 2011 with the support of CISMAI (Italian Coordination of Services against Child Maltreatment and Abuse), the minors involved as spectators or victims of domestic violence in Italy were around 400 thousand, while ISTAT (Higher Institute of Statistics) counted in over 6 million and 700 thousand women between the ages of 16 and 70 were victims of violence, 690 thousand were those who suffered it at home and had children, and 400 thousand children were present (2015 data). And behind each of these numbers, behind each of these stories there is a small spectator who “will have consequences equal to those of a directly mistreated and abused child”.1.2. Gender violenceThe expression “gender violence” indicates all those forms of violence that affect a large number of people discriminated against on the basis of gender, i.e. sex. It therefore ranges from the psychological and physical to the sexual, from the persecutory acts of stalking up to rape and, as an extreme consequence, feminicide, that is, the murder of the woman as such.Since in the vast majority of cases the victims of gender violence are women (it is no coincidence that, historically, the female gender has been defined as the “weaker sex”), gender violence effectively coincides with violence against women and therefore with the content of the UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. The latter had been preceded by the United Nations WorldConference (Vienna, 14-25 June 1993), in which gender violence (specifically against women) had already been defined as “any act of gender violence involving, or is likely to result in physical, sexual or psychological suffering or any form of suffering to the woman, including threats of such violence, forms of coercion or arbitrary forms of deprivation of personal liberty whether occurring in the context of private life or the public one”.A few months later, on 20 December 1993, with Resolution 48/104, the aforementioned Declaration on the elimination of violence against women was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, albeit without a vote. it contains the recognition of the “urgent need for the universal application to women of the rights and principles relating to equality, security, freedom, integrity and dignity of all human beings”(Manicardi, 2011).The Resolution therefore recalls and embodies the same rights and principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (i.e. the document on the rights of the person, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in its third session, on 10 December 1948 in Paris with the Resolution 219077A).Articles 1 and 2 of the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women provide the most widespread definition of violence against women(OHCR, 1993):Article 1: “For the purposes of this Declaration, the term ‘violence against women’ means any act of gender-based violence that causes, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether in public or private life.”Article 2: “Violence against women is defined as including, but not limited to, the following:a. Physical, sexual and psychological violence occurring within the family, including beatings, sexual abuse of female children in the family, dowry violence, marital rape, female
NEVER ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN56genital mutilation and other traditional practices harmful to women, non-marital violence and violence linked to exploitation;b. Physical, sexual and psychological violence that occurs within the community at large, including rape, sexual abuse, sexual harassment and intimidation at work, in educational institutions and elsewhere, trafficking in women and forced prostitution;c. Physical, sexual and psychological violence perpetrated or condoned by the State, wherever it occurs”.Article 3: “Women have the right to the equal enjoyment and protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms in political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other fields. These rights include, among other things:a. The right to life;b. The right to equality;c. The right to liberty and security of the person;d. The right to equal protection before the law;e. The right to be free from all forms of discrimination;f. The right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health;g. The right to fair and favorable working conditions;h. The right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”In 1999, as a consequence of the Resolution, the United Nations General Assembly, led by the representative of the Dominican Republic, then designated November 25 of each year as the “International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women”(based on Francesco Miraglia’s speech at the “il Caso Bibbiano” conference organized in Cavriago on 4 October 2019).2. The many faces of gender violenceThe forms and ways in which violence is expressed can also be of various types: -verbal threats of abuse, aggression or torture towards the woman and/or her family, children, friends; -repeated threats of abandonment, divorce, starting another relationship if the woman does not satisfy certain requests; -damage or destruction of the woman’s property; -violence against animals dear to the woman and/or her children. It is important to remember that in moments of anger we can all use provocative, insulting or contemptuous words and we can behave in inappropriate ways but usually followed by remorse and repentance. In psychological violence, however, it is not a momentary outburst of anger but rather a constant and intentional torment with the aim of subjugating the other and maintaining one’s own power and control.” There is no profile of the typical woman who suffers violence. It can involve all women.It takes on manyforms and modalities, although the physical one is the easiest to recognize. Here is a sort of sample.2.1. Physical violence“It includes the use of any act driven by the intention to harm or terrorize the victim. Acts attributable to physical violence are:throwing objects;pushing;slaps;bites, kicks or punches;hit or try to hit with an object;beatings;suffocation;threat with a firearm or knife;use of a firearm or cutting weapon.These forms occur in the crimes of battery, personal injury, private violence, home invasion, kidnapping.”
Francesco MIRAGLIA572.2. Sexual violence“It includes the imposition of unwanted sexual practices or relationships that are physically harmful and harmful to dignity, obtained through threats or blackmail of various kinds.The imposition of an unwanted sexual relationship or intimacy is an act of humiliation, oppression and subjugation, which causes deep psychological as well as physical wounds in the victim.”2.3. Psychological violence“It encompasses every form of abuse that damages the identity of women:-verbal attacks such as derision, verbal harassment, insult, denigration, aimed at convincing the woman that she is “worth nothing”, to better keep her under control;-isolate the woman, distance her from supportive social relationships or prevent her access to economic and non-economic resources, so as to limit her independence;-jealousy and obsessiveness: excessive control, repeated accusations of infidelity and control of his acquaintances2.4. Economic violenceOften such violence is difficult to register as a form of violence because it may seem normal and obvious that the management of family finances is the man’s responsibility. Economic violence is defined as: -limit or deny access to family finances; -hide the family’s patrimonial situation and financial resources; -prohibit, hinder or boycott women’s work outside the home; -not fulfilling the maintenance duties established by law; -exploit women as workforce in the family business or in general without giving any type of remuneration in exchange; -take possession of the woman’s savings or earnings from work and use them to their own advantage; -implement every form of legal protection for the exclusive personal advantage and to the detriment of the woman (for example, the registration of properties); -impose legal commitments by deception, threats or blackmail. This form of direct control, which limits and/or prevents the woman’s economic independence, often does not allow escape from adestructive relationship of mistreatment.” Stalking (Persecutory acts) “It indicates the oppressive behavior carried out by the persecutor towards the victim who rejected him (mainly the ex-partner). Often the stalker’s conduct is subtle, aimed at harassing the victim and placing her in a state of anxiety and awe, with the aim of compromising her serenity, making her feel hunted, and in any case not free(Palmieri, 2021).2.5. Domestic violenceThe most widespread violence, contrary to what is thought even if we have now become aware of the reality of the phenomenon, is that which occurs within the home, or within the family. It consists of a continuous series of different actions but characterized by a common purpose: domination and control by one partner over the other, through psychological, physical, economic and sexual violence.The World Bank recognizes domestic violence as a public health problem, as it seriously affects the psychological and physical well-being of all family members.According to the definition that was given way back in 1996 by the World Health Organization, “domestic or intra-family violence includes every form of physical, psychological or sexual violence and concerns both subjects who have, have had or intend to have an intimate relationship between a couple and individuals who have parental or emotional relationships within a more or less extended family unit”.This definition still seems to us to be the most incisive and
NEVER ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN58extensive because it manages to extend to all the newtypes of interpersonal relationships that in the meantime have emerged, spread and consolidated, profoundly changing the social perception of the concepts of family nucleus, parental relationship, intimate couple and emotional relationship.The mechanismthat best defines the phases of a condition of domestic violence suffered by a woman is called “spiral of violence” or “cycle of violence”, to indicate the ways in which the violent man achieves his goal of subjugating his partner making her feel incapable, weak, helpless, totally dependent on him.The phases of the spiral of violence can present themselves in a crescendo and then “mix”: isolation, intimidation, threats, blackmail of children, physical and sexual assaults often alternate with phases of relative calm and false reconciliations, with the aim of confusing the woman and weaken her further.2.6. Witnessed violenceThis term refers to violence witnessed by minors, that is, a form of child abuseand psychological maltreatment that occurs mainly within the family, in the presence of domestic violence. It is indirect violence, not suffered personally but through violence on other individuals present in the family, usually the mother.Minors may bedirectly exposed to violence or abuse when it occurs in their presence or may have indirect knowledge of it when someone, voluntarily or unconsciously, informs them about it; or, again, they can perceive its effects when they feel sadness, terror, anguishand a continuous state of alert of the victim or when they see bruises, wounds, torn clothes, tears, broken furnishings, etc.Minor victims of witnessed violence are invisible: invisible to the mother, who no longer has resources, and invisible to society, which barely recognizes them. They see, unseen, a daily climate of shame masked behind the appearance of normality.Their involvement in domestic violence can occur not only during the parents’ cohabitation, but also during the separation phase and after the separation itself. These last two phases are particularly at risk due to their involvement by the violent father/partner, who can use the children as a tool to reiterate the mistreatment of the mother and to continue to control her. Furthermore, in these phases the risk of escalation of violence and the possibility of a lethal outcome (murder of the mother, multiple homicides, murder-suicide) increases.The dynamics of domestic violence obviously interfere with the relationship with children, altering the expression of the parental functions of the maltreating mother and father and the attachment models(Vita et al., 2023).CONCLUSIONSSo, what conclusions should be drawn? What kind of advice should be given to women and mothers victims of domestic violence by the hand of their husband or partner? Don’t file a complaint because it will just get worse? Because, reporting will only add to the punishment of seeing your child removed from you.In the meantime, every taxpayer continues to pay in order to support a system based on a double form of suffering, which also leads to the death of the woman and mother, in a femicide

hatched in the complicit silence of the insititutions since it holds a woman prisoner in a house where she continues to suffer until the final explosion. Does that seem fair to you? (Palmieri et al., 2021)
Francesco MIRAGLIA59REFERENCES1.Antonocci G. Prejudices and the Christian knowledge of psychiatry, Cooperativa Apache SRL, Rome19862.Guidi Antonio, Palmieri Vincenza, MiragliaFrancesco, “Never a child again. Families, institutions, family homes, children’s rights”, Armando Editore, Rome 20133.Manicardi Nunzia, “Crazy cases. When Justice, Psychiatry and Social Services cross the path of the Italian citizen. Francesco Miraglia, an anti-current lawyer”, Koinè Nuove Edizioni, Rome 20074.Manicardi Nunzia, Give us our children back! Stories of children stolen from their families told by their lawyer Francesco Miraglia, Edizioni Il Fiorino, Modena 20115.MiragliaFrancesco, “Social Services, Custody and Parenting. Something to clarify”, Artestampa Fioranese (Fiorano, MO), 2016.

Miraglia Francesco, “The Children’s Advocate. Too much power without control: this is how false family abuse and illicit foster care are built” presentation by Francesco Morcavallo, preface by Vincenza Palmieri, afterword by Raffaella Regoli, Armando Editore, Rome 20227.Palmieri Vincenza, Francesco Miraglia, “Prison Children” preface by Mario Giordano, afterword by Francesco Morcavallo, Armando Editore, Rome 20218.PalmieriVincenza, Psychiatric Filieria in Italy -from Basaglia to Bibianoe until the time of Coronavirus, Armando Editore, Rome 20219.

Palmieri Vincenza, Miraglia Francesco, “Dad take me away from here! Dedicated to Anna Giulia, 7 years old, Italian citizen”, Armando Editore, Rome 201510.VitaDaniela, MiragliaFrancesco,”I’m here too” Disability is a dimension of human diversity. Armando Editore, Rome 202311.Council of

Europe.Recommendation n° 8 of 2003, Council of Europe. https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/47261704/COE_rec_2003_8_en.pdf/7f6642ac-c3ea-4d5d-8b66-35492d37f9d1?t=137760142600012.https://autonomie.regione.emilia-romagna.it/polizia-locale/promozione-e-comunicazione/vademecum/13.Office of the High Commissioner, United Nations (OHCR), Declaration of the elimination of violence against women, 1993. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-elimination-violence-against-women